POST SOCIAL 101: AN ORAL HISTORY-PART THREE

3. THE ELUSIVE SAM GALLIGAN, SIDE PROJECTS, THE POST SOCIAL SPEED ROUND, FINAL WORDS AND PARTING THOUGHTS

During the entire duration of this interview project, I had hoped to somehow connect with Post Social Bassist Sam Galligan. While I did meet him on Record Store Day, he was indeed a reticent figure and one who proved to be entirely unreachable once this project began and continued in earnest. So, it was of course obvious to ask Shannon, Brendan and Mitch about their lifelong friend and bandmate.

Sam Galligan has been conspicuously absent from this project. What do you feel is Sam’s greatest strength within Post Social?

BRENDAN: It is a well-known fact by now that Sam does not exist on Facebook. I'm sure you've gotten the butt end of that reality. It is the perfect metaphor though, and also the reason why it is so hard to answer that question. Sam is the most mysterious man I know. It would be along impossible to predict what he would say about us or how he would answer any of your questions. I do know without a doubt that he loves playing his instrument and he loves being a part of this band, as do the rest of us. Sam's biggest strength is his ability to craft basslines that sneak up on you. By that, I mean you may not be particularly interested or impressed by it at first, but after it settles in your head, it doesn't leave. They often take time to be fully realized.

SHANNON: Sam has a lot of really inventive and unconventional basslines, and he gives songs a completely different vibe once he plays on them. I think his biggest strength is his ability to completely alter a song for the better. I did a one-off song last winter called “Concepts” that he played bass with me on, and he completely made the song.

The original idea I had was that it would be a really sloppy and simple song, and even though it still was after he wrote his part, he gave it this energy that it didn't have and it turned into this super funky punk song.

MITCH: I love and respect all the guys in our band. I am humbled to be playing and writing songs with all of them. They are all amazing musicians. But, Sam is the best of us all. It might not seem like it when you meet him, but this man is everything to our band. He is the most versatile of all of us. He has an intense passion for music that I can honestly admit surpasses mine. He is brilliant at crafting melodies, he can write an amazing bass line to any guitar riff you throw at him, and every time I bring a song idea to the band, I might at first be skeptical of Shannon’s and Bren’s parts but Sam instantly knows exactly what the songs needs bass wise and it's truly incredible.

This wasn't always the case, because early high school, just before we started writing PS 1 songs, Sam was no doubt the least enthusiastic about our band. But, something clicked and he was the one dogging us about scheduling practices all the time and you could hear in his bass lines he had suddenly gotten really fucking passionate. I hope listeners can hear all this in his lines on PS1, because I certainly do. And when our new album comes out, I beg every listener to concentrate on Sam's parts because they are too brilliant to go unnoticed. When it comes to talking publically about our band, Sam usually takes a back seat. He has a lot to say, but he always lets the bass do the talking.

I have always found it fascinating to think about how much actual music exists within a band and its members. Like when a member departs and crafts a solo project or begins an additional band. I am also of the understanding that all of you are involved in several side projects. Is that true?

MITCH: I make electronic music under the name "Hypnopaedia" (A Brave New World reference) and have a mixtape and an EP up on Soundcloud. But I'm looking to maybe do some solo stuff this fall if I can find the time. That's about it.

Shannon, can you tell us about “Wayne”?

SHANNON: Wayne is an alias I release music under occasionally as an outlet for my guitar songs that don't make it to the band. It's pretty inconsistent and I've slowed down with it recently, but I've been trying to put together an album since last year. We'll see if that ever happens.

And Brendan, you are certainly extremely busy as you have also been performing as the drummer for Madison’s Modern Mod. How did joining that band come to you?

BRENDAN: I believe Emily Massey (Modern Mod lead singer/guitarist) was the reason I became involved in Modern Mod. Emma “Ronnie” Clarke (former Modern Mod drummer) and Max Werner (former Modern Mod guitarist) were leaving the band for school so they needed a new drummer. Post Social had played with Modern Mod in a few sets already so they knew who we were, but Emily knew me personally from East High. They must've decided I was the right fit! *Fun Fact* -They originally wanted both Shannon and I to play with them to maintain the 5 member line-up.

What are the similarities and differences to performing with both Post Social and Modern Mod for you? Is it difficult to juggle the time and energy with both bands?

BRENDAN: I think the most apparent difference in experience would be the size and interest level of each audience. Fans of Modern Mod are plentiful and thirsty, while fans of Post Social are fewer but no less loyal. It seems near impossible to sum up my experience with both concisely; I apologize for not being able to answer that very well.

It's always tricky to find the time in a day to achieve everything I'd like to, but playing with two bands is hardly a chore. I love every moment I can get playing drums in a band! It's also a myth that one needs to split their creative energy between two projects. Since they are two different projects, you're taking energy from a completely different source. Modern Mod provides a priceless amount of live show experience. I feel like I've grown as a performer since joining that band, and am much more comfortable on stage to boot. Post Social provides nearly everything that I love about being in a band: jamming, songwriting, recording and experimenting, and having a ton of fun with it all. My new project with Alivia Kleinfeldt (Modern Mod co-founder/bassist/singer) lets me focus solely on songwriting and arranging, and in the end, creating a piece of art. This is the project where I feel I can be the most creative and have the most control over what I'm making, which is so being valuable to me. Everything else musical is more or less just for fun, playing around with Wayne songs or hopping on FL Studio and making a trap beat for the hell of it.

Shannon, regarding Wayne, what is the most satisfying aspect of creating music away from Post Social?

SHANNON: When we're writing songs in Post Social, a lot of editing and refining happens when a song is brought to the table. It's completely different from what it's going to be in the end. Also, in Wayne and my other music, I can change things really fast and/or drastically, and there's no one to ask permission or warn. That's kind of nice to have, but I think that it also ends up hindering me because I tend to make dumb decisions right before I put out my own music, like adding a keyboard part that doesn't really need to be there or stripping things down too much. I think the most satisfying part of it for me is I have the chance to make stuff that's a bit more personal, and I can have my own vision that can stay alive for the entire process. Also I can play keys more, play drums, bass, guitar…all of that is probably the most rewarding. 

And now, I wanted to give the members of Post Social a slight break from just speaking about themselves so exclusively. Now, I am pleased to present the “Speed Round” where Shannon, Brendan and Mitch speak a tad more widely about music itself, from their personal preferences and even some dislikes.

Who is your favorite artist or band and why?

BRENDAN: It goes without saying that this question is painfully difficult to answer as asked. Just way too hard to narrow it down, but Wilco has been a part of my life for as long as I can remember and I adore everything they've done. They have perfected the art of blending classic and accessible songwriting with textures and ideas most have never heard, while maintaining a kind of musicianship I envy so much.

MITCH: Favorite band is probably The National. They put on the best concerts I have ever seen (once at the Orpheum and once at Eau Claire Fest) All of their albums really creep into me. They craft amazing melodies that get stuck in your head, and have a certain mysterious aura, and I cannot explain why it is appealing, but it is.

SHANNON: I don't think I could really ever pin down a favorite artist. I was definitely really into Real Estate and Mac Demarco in high school. Also Elliott Smith and R.E.M. If anything on our album comes across as a Real Estate ripoff, it's my fault. We’re trying to distance ourselves from that sound a little bit on the next album.

Who do you feel is a most underrated artist?

MITCH: I'm honestly not sure about most underrated or overrated artists... Obviously there are many, many, artists that are mega famous that I would like to say don't deserve the attention but that's simply because I don't like that style of music. My philosophy on music is that, if someone can connect with style of music that I can't, it's still a valid artist or album or song. The fact that an artist, album or song makes another person feel the same happiness that I feel when I listen to the music that I like, is completely validating.

BRENDAN: In the hours I've spent surfing Bandcamp I've found quite a few great things, but my favorite discovery has to also be my vote on most underrated artist. Stephen Steinbrink is quite simply a songwriting genius. I struggle to find words to praise him, I just urge you to listen to his music.

SHANNON: For me, Weezer is a very underrated artist for my generation specifically. I think lots of people my age tend to remember them for the song "Beverly Hills,” or the albums they've done in the last 10 years. I don't think everyone my age is tuned into Rivers Cuomo's sense of humor. He is a genius and I think he just got bored with the original Weezer sound and tried really hard to make them a pop band, which I think is funny and I respect him for. “The Blue Album” and “Pinkerton” are some of the best albums ever, and some people don't get to see that side of Weezer because of their own misconceptions about them as a band.  “Pinkerton” is also a “desert island album” for me. I think Mitch hates Weezer and my goal is to get him to like them someday.

Oh, also another EXTREMELY underrated band (Slept on) is BALKANS from Atlanta. They disbanded a few years ago before they could really get off the ground. They sound a lot like The Strokes but I like them more than The Strokes.

A more "current" underrated artist that I have to mention is Alex G. He's like 22 years old and he is a songwriting genius. He has back catalog on his Bandcamp all the way from 2009, which would be from about his junior year in high school. I got into him from his album “DSU” and listened through his entire discography and loved it all. His album “Winner” is probably my favorite of his older stuff. I highly recommend checking him out if you like kind of shoegazey angsty music.

How about an artist you feel is overrated?

BRENDAN: Dave Matthews. My lack of appreciation of Dave Matthews is pretty shallow so I won't be able to give you a very good explanation. He managed to get so popular with songwriting that seems so uninspired, like his only goal is to rake in more money.

SHANNON: Most overrated artist has to be either U2 or Coldplay. I love early U2, I just don't think their output past the 90's has deserved the acclaim it has gotten. My Mom played the album “How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb” to death and it left a sour taste in my mouth.

I could imagine that U2 for you is like what The Rolling Stones right now are for me.

SHANNON: Accurate. I think younger people are more cynical about U2. I think it just happens the longer a band stays around.

Which musical trend do you feel needs to quickly vanish?

BRENDAN: Contemporary Country and Rap fusion is the worst thing to plague this planet.

MITCH: I think a musical trend that needs to go away is artists who make albums so utterly digital in a way so that their shows are terrible. It seems like a golden rule to me to never make your album sound better than you could play it live. But, I've seen a lot of shows where that rule is broken, sadly enough. A musical trend that has come out of the negative side of digital records is the cool and innovative way artists can have of performing very digital stuff live. Some people just play an instrumental and sing/rap over it which will always sound worse live than on the studio version. But some artists have really cool live interpretations of their music played differently with instruments, synths sample pads and it's a fresh live experience from the album, which can be rare but really cool when you see it.

SHANNON: As far as musical trends go, there aren't really I can identify that bother me. I think Autotune got a lot of unfair backlash because it was supposed to destroy "real" music. But I really liked how Bon Iver used it on his self-titled album, which is another desert island album.

I think the only trend I want to go away is the trend of trying to make "real" music by using old recording methods or posturing oneself as a more "real" musician because of their aesthetic choices. I'm all for older recording methods and we're recording our album on a 4 track cassette machine right now, but something I hear a lot now from older people in the music world is that the way they did things was more authentic. A lot of people are against recording onto a computer because it's not punk enough, but I think what punk is all about is utilizing the resources you have available, which for my generation is a laptop and an audio interface.

Another thing that bothers me is that people are afraid of progress in music. I think the 80's were a time when music technology was being pushed to the greatest extent, and people wanted to have synths and gated reverb and all this studio magic on their songs, and then after the backlash from that happened, the response was to strip back to simpler stuff. Which makes sense, because you never want to overdo it, but I think it's a shame that we aren't more supportive of all the technology we have on our hands to make music with.

I think people are afraid of making music that sounds dated. People are more concerned with going back to the past than finding a new sound. I think the best thing is always keeping an open mind.

That is a very intriguing answer to me because as a fan/listener, I have lamented for years about the lack of "new sounds" especially as the 50s-90's had so much innovation and transformations. So much of what I hear today feels derivative in some respects. But at the same time, I love those sounds from the past. Not in that Jack White fashion which can be so self-important. But, in the way where the music sounded...warmer, I guess. I love those dry drums sounds, those analog synths, the Fender Rhodes keyboards...that sort of thing. Shannon, do you feel that the music of hip-hop has shown more sonic openness than rock and roll? What could rock learn from hip-hop and electronic music?

SHANNON: I don't want to try to speak for the entire rock genre because obviously there are plenty of innovative and exciting bands, but I do think that the worlds of rap and electronic seem to be more focused on progression right now. I think simplicity will always be great, but I'm not afraid to branch out into the world of sampling and computer editing and all that stuff. I think there's a lot of great things waiting to happen. My main argument here is really against the Jack White school of thought, which doesn't hold a lot of ground in other genres.

Which musical trend would you like to see make a grand return?

BRENDAN: It would be my dream to have big band jazz like Count Basie hit top 40. Jazz in general is dying out in popularity so is love to see a resurgence.

Really? What is your personal/emotional connection to jazz? What speaks to you about the genre?

BRENDAN: When I was a very small toddler, my parents often took me to jazz and avant garde jazz shows. They've told me that unlike a normal toddler, I sat and watched intently every player. My magnetism towards the genre hasn't changed since then; I still find every aspect so fluid yet calculated and just so enthralling.

We’re almost at the end. Could you please tell us what it means to you to be a working musician in Madison? What are the pros and cons?

SHANNON: The best part by far about being a performing musician in Madison is the community of college students who have a demand for music. But, Madison unfortunately seems to be a city that's dominated by more "hobby bands" that might play little free festivals a lot of the younger bands that take themselves more seriously usually die or leave Madison. And, the college aged community is kind of insular so, the most important shows for me to reach people my age who actually care about my music are DIY shows in apartments or warehouses, which is kind of sad. I love playing those shows but I wish there were more opportunities for younger bands.

BRENDAN: Hmmm, let's start with the good: Madison is an incredible place to be if you're a young (teenage and younger) musician. It provided Post Social many great opportunities to play out at The Loft, the Harmony Bar, etc., when other cities may not have been so willing. We're just some little kids with instruments after all.

Moving onto the less good now. Once you reach a certain age where the gimmick of being young wears off and you're in the sea of other indie bands trying to make it, it feels like there is little to no support. It feels like the scene for music like ours from people our age is almost non-existent in Madison. So as grateful as I am to have grown up here (I'm really not trying to bash it), I feel like it's time to try our hand elsewhere.

MITCH: Pros of being in Madison: People like Ricky Reimer, Science of Sound Studios, beautiful amazing city, venues like the High Noon, Orpheum, a couple of nice DIYS, lots of college students, lots of music festivals. Cons: People are used to free music, not very willing to pay, low interest in local acts as opposed to touring acts or international bands, little to no agents, record labels and "big time" opportunities here. It seems unimaginable to make a career in music here, but you never know. I personally love the city so much I usually look past all of this. And with the internet, it's much easier to make it big no matter where you are.

Finally, there is the romance of being in a band and then, there is the reality. I think that there remains this perception that bands are like The Monkees, a group of people who are best friends who live and make music together and so on. But, in the case of Post Social, you are individuals who have been lifelong friends who make music together. What does it mean to all of you to create music with your friends? How do you see the future of Post Social and your musical lives?

BRENDAN: I feel ultimately privileged to be in a band like post social. In a lot of ways it is like The Monkees, and it's incredible to me, and just so much fun to make music with my friends. Although playing with them alone is worth it for me, I'd love to see us get a little more recognition. Because when I put my heart and soul into a project and end up proud of it, I want to show it off! As far as my own musical life, I just want to keep putting out records and that's all I really care about. It doesn't matter to me what name they're under, as long as I'm continuing to make a product.

MITCH: The thing I love most about our band is that it is, above everything else, an incredibly strong friendship and bond between the main four guys is something bigger than the band itself. Playing with Post Social feels like I'm living the dream. It's the best thing to happen to me because it's a dual benefit: Having an amazing lifelong friendship with three great guys, and also being in a band with them, playing music that I can't get enough of. I can't really put into words the significance of these guys to me. Making music with them, being friends with them, feels like a lifelong accomplishment to me already, and I'm only 18. I'm pretty lucky. I have no idea what the future holds, but all the guys will be in it, in some shape or form. I am positive of that. And hopefully Post Social will survive until the day we all die of old age on stage.

SHANNON: I think the best part about doing music with the guys is that we've all been friends since before our band, and we grew up together. Our music has kind of served as something productive we could do while hanging out. We've all grown as songwriters together over the years and it's been really fun and rewarding. We want to be successful, I think. Obviously making a living off of music is the dream for any band. We are definitely doing music together regardless of how successful we are though. I think the thing I would like most is to just be able to have my music mean something to other people. That's more fulfilling to me than anything else. Death or Glory!

Amen to that! Amen!!

With that, the interview with the members of Post Social drew to a close and now, the band members are now all college Freshmen, beginning this next phase of their lives while also continuing to pursue their musical dreams. Post Social’s second album, entitled “Young Randolphs,” is in the can and is just about ready to be released as a free download from their Bandcamp page or also available as a $5 cassette. On a recent visit to B-Side, I was most fortunate to hear a few minutes of their latest, admittedly lo-fi, self-produced effort and I was instantly struck with the inventiveness, energy and superior musicianship on display, making me anxious to hear this new batch of 12 songs.

I don’t know about any of you out there, dear readers and listeners, but I can say that when I was 18 years old, I was nowhere near as articulate, self-aware, invested or as focused as these young people. To be fair, I have no idea of how they are individually handling and experiencing all aspects of their lives but in regards to their music and their relationships with each other, I am deeply impressed and feel so fortunate that all of them took such valuable time out of their busy lives to speak with me. My gratitude is bottomless!

So what do the members of Post Social love to listen to? The CODA to this series will feature the band's "Desert Island" selections for you to peruse and augment your collections with.

POST SOCIAL 101: AN ORAL HISTORY-PART TWO

2. RECORDING THE ALBUM, ENTER SIV EARLEY, THE LACK OF COVER SONGS 

AND THEIR FAVORITE SONG TO PERFORM LIVE

What led to the idea of recording your first album?

BRENDAN: Well, I think it just seemed like the next step. We had more than enough material and the drive to do so, so why not?

SHANNON: We've always been super serious about recording our music. It seems like a lot of teenage bands don't think too seriously about albums in the sense that a really pro band would, but we've always wanted to put out music as much as possible. We like to do things ourselves as much as possible but when we wanted to record our album last year, we decided to go into a real studio.

MITCH: Recording an album for us was something we had kind of been doing (at home) for a while, but one day, I remember Shannon was telling me that he just googled studios and Ricky Reimer's Science Of Sound came up first. He showed me pictures and my immediate thoughts were: Okay, we're going to record an album for real now. When we went in, met Ricky and checked out SOS studios in person, we busted our asses to practice and write a bunch of new songs to make an album. ‘Cause at that point, we really, really, wanted to record.

The album was recorded pretty quickly. We finished all the instrumentals in about a weekend, and the vocals took longer, (Me and Shan were writing lyrics as the recording process was happening) but I think the most striking thing about the recording process to me, was the pure high that we all got from it. I remember the first night after laying down “Something In The Water,” and hearing it played back to us on Ricky's monitors, was just so much joy to us, because we hadn't ever heard our music at such good quality recording before. That will forever be a life highlight for me, and I assume the rest of the crew as well. To put it simply: it was euphoric.

Shannon, going back to “Change Your Mind” for a moment, I particularly loved your lead vocal on that track as it really worked as a counterpoint to Mitch’s primary lead vocals. Might you sing again on any future music?

SHANNON: Right now, I could potentially be singing on a lot of songs on or next album. The way I write takes a really long time, and Mitch tends to snatch up songs if I don't claim them for myself. So, we'll see. It all comes down to the way we write song sin general, which is always instrumental first. But, I'm definitely going to sing more on the next album though.

With all of the material that you have written, especially since the release of the first album, is Post Social averse to creating a double album? Or would that be too expensive for you to realize? 

BRENDAN: I can only speak for myself, but I would love to make a double album. We certainly have enough material, but there are things keeping us from doing that. One is, of course, our budget. Producing such an album would be twice as much time in the studio and much more money into the physical production of it, which we can't really afford. Another is that our favorite studio engineer, Ricky Reimer, has limited availability and may not have time in his schedule to fit that.

SHANNON: I don't think we are against the idea of a double album. We definitely have the material for it. What I can say is regardless of how long our next album is, we will continue to write and work ahead to another album.

MITCH: We haven't really talked about a double album yet, but I feel like we all like moving on to new projects and that's part of our writing new songs all the time, so it seems like we would prefer to release two separate albums one after another than a double album.

One of the elements that captured my attention tremendously on “Post Social” were the backing vocals of Siv Earley, who has since departed the band to attend college. Throughout, I found her to have this rather ghostly yet melodic effect over her contributions to the songs, and with each subsequent listen, I always find myself hanging onto her ethereal vocals.

Siv was actually the very first band member I reached out to for this project and in doing so, she was the first to answer questions that have since already been answered by Shannon, Brendan and Mitch. So, as of this time, I will allow Siv to give you her own musical background and history in her own words.

SIV EARLEY (former Post Social backing vocals, age 19): I think that my earliest musical memory is from when I was about 4. I have this very vivid memory of jumping around with my dad in the living room of our first apartment in Madison, listening to Sleater-Kinney. I'm pretty sure the album must have been “All Hands on the Bad One,” which was my very favorite for a long time. I worshiped them because they are such bad ass lady rockers.

I also listened to a lot of Blondie... I love Debbie Harry's voice because it's so pure and pretty, but she can also really belt things out and rock. I loved the Who and Queen and the Ramones in elementary school, but my very favorite song back then was (and kind of still is) "Me and Julio Down by the Schoolyard" by Paul Simon. I have to give a special shout-out to teen queen Avril Lavigne, who inspired my first ever public performance in second grade. I performed her song "Complicated" at Mother Fool's coffee house during an open mic night. That was actually a really special performance for me because it was the first time I ever stood up in front of a bunch of strangers and sang on my own, and also because my Dad accompanied me on guitar, which was hugely comforting.

There wasn't really a specific point when realized I loved singing, it was just something I always did because it made me feel good. Although, I had horrible stage fright up until about junior year, when I started singing with a band from school. I took voice lessons from about fourth to eighth grade, but I wasn't a huge fan of them because the recitals were torture for me. I remember right before I was supposed to sing at my first recital, I had a panic attack and started crying and refused to go on... I ended up performing, but I hated it and felt incredibly nervous and uncomfortable the whole time. I think that this was because I felt like the people there didn't really want to listen to me, they were just there because their kids were performing. And even though I knew I had a nice voice and people generally enjoyed listening to me, that really bothered me. I guess this changed in high school because people started asking me to sing with them and I knew that when we performed, the people in the audience were there because they wanted to be... they weren't being forced to sit through a two hour long recital. That gave me a lot of confidence, and made me actually want to perform and enjoy performing.

How did you become involved with Post Social?

SIV: I started singing with Post Social about a year and a half ago. I went to school with all of them but we were in different grades, so we didn't see each other often. I worked with Brendan and one day he asked if I had any interest in singing with the band for Battle of the Bands at our high school. After that, they started invited me to more practices and Mitch had me learn more of the songs, and when they started getting gigs this past year, they wanted me to sing with them.

BRENDAN: Siv joined Post Social a little over a year ago when we heard her sing in our "rival band" A-Len and the Thundercocks at East High's Battle of the Bands. This is when we realized she has an incredible voice and Mitch proposed we ask her to sing with us. She was delighted when we finally did ask her (lucky us).

Now that Siv has departed the band and Madison for college, what do you think her influence was over your original band dynamic and music, live and in the studio, if any? How do you think that she affected Mitch's singing style, if at all?

BRENDAN: Siv was a very fluid addition to the band actually. By that, I mean she didn't change the dynamic of the band much in terms of writing. She only added parts that seemed as though they always should've been there. For our live show, she definitely did a fantastic job of smoothing out any rough spots we may have. She is very good at that. In the studio was where she was most influential I think. Her vocals added so much to the sound of our album as a whole and created an atmosphere that would've been desperately missed without her.

SHANNON: I think she helped bolster the vocals on the recordings of "Change Your Mind" and "Running On Fumes" especially. 

BRENDAN: I think Mitch just keeps on keeping on, really. He didn't do much asking the changing of lines when Siv joined, but that created a very ingesting dynamic of a quite loud, emotion packed vocal style paired with her very ethereal, pretty vocals.

MITCH: Siv was an amazing addition to the band and she instantly had a positive effect on the songs we were writing, my vocal lines, and our general sound overall. I love the low male octave and high female octave that bands like The National do, and Siv entering the scene made it possible to do that (like on "Something In The Water"). 

But also, Siv brought and unbelievable dynamic to PS that we hand't had before: Harmonies! If I wanted a harmony part, I'd simply show Siv the part, and being the natural that she is, she would find the perfect harmony line almost instantly.

We're all sad to see her go off to college, and to not have her on or next album, "Young Randolphs."

What are the most wonderful or difficult aspects of recording and live performances for you?

SHANNON: I always like hearing a song develop in the studio/experimenting with weird pedals and stuff. Mitch is using a lot of his old Ibanez chorus pedal on our new album and it's sounding great!

BRENDAN: Recording is an almost fully wonderful thing for us. We always seem so productive and are often happy with our results. It's a rewarding process to say the least, I can't complain. Live shows are where most of the difficulty lies in my eyes. I feel that we could improve on aspects like professionalism but it's almost always made up for by the amount of fun we have on stage.

Is it true that Post Social does not perform cover songs?

MITCH: It's not like an Post Social motto to not perform covers. We just have this history of always playing our own songs whenever we could, ‘cause the sort of norm at our age was to cover songs (back in Shrunken Heads/early PS era) so we wanted to stray from that. We've tried covers but usually never really get the drive to perfect them or do them justice. But, we did cover the song "Happy" last year, at High Noon Saloon's "Exile on Willy St." show, and that was a blast. So we're definitely not opposed.

BRENDAN: It is definitely not something we practice. We attempted to perform a satirical version of a Counting Crows song. It seemed we enjoyed that one more than the audience did. 

SHANNON: Contrary to popular belief, Post Social is very fond of covers. We have considered covering “Jailbreak” or “The Boys Are Back In Town” by Thin Lizzy. I think the thing is that we’ve never needed to use covers to fill up space in our sets, so really when we do them, we’re just doing them for fun. We might even throw a cover on our next album. 

What is your favorite song to perform live and why?

SHANNON: I personally love playing our new song "Ohio" live. I get to use my delay pedal to do some math rock-y stutter effects. I also love to play "Days" from our first album, because it's a very easy song, it's a lot of fun to play and it gets me in this nice transcendental state of mind.

BRENDAN: My favorite song to perform has to be one created post-album, "Ohio." It has an intoxicating energy that doesn't get stale. If I had to choose one from the album, it would have to be "Something In The Water," also a complete blast with the second half of the song.

MITCH: Favorite song to perform live? Hands down, "Ohio"! It will be out on our new album and I think (though not certain) this might be a unanimous favorite within the band. Its energy, its melody, the beauty of all of our parts really hit hardest in this song for me, and it makes me euphoric every time our band plays it. Every other song we've had has been, at some point or another, boring or not fun to play for whatever reason. Not "Ohio" though. Never "Ohio."

Stay tuned for Part Three of this Oral History where the band gives us the scoop about their treasured friend and Bassist Sam Galligan, their favorite and least favorite musical trends, the pros and cons of being a working band in Madison and some choice final words.